Why
I am not upset that Elena Ferrante has come out of the closet, or to be more
precise forced out? Is it because I don’t think the smell of mothball is invigorating
for a writer, or maybe it’s because any mystery needs a revelation? Ferrante
had become so entangled with her literary persona that in my imagination she
was just that: a virtual writer who didn’t need to be real. In a world where
virtual reality is as real as it gets and personalities become famous by
inventing a captivating personas who needs real people?
Ferrante
was just that: distant, mysterious, unreal. Adoring fans could mould her into
their own image: almost a religious experience. So, are you a stressed out,
overworked woman? You could be her walking down the shopping mall with two
heavy bags of grocery, and she could be just like you. Are you a desk-ridden
translator with literary aspirations who spends all God-given hours of the day
and night on a laptop: you could be her; it could be you. Oops! In this case it
is you, I mean her.
The
big news came out three weeks ago on the American and English press −a
proof of how popular Ferrante is in English speaking countries− like
a storm in a teacup. Her real name is Anita Raja, she works as a translator and
is married to a writer.
But
does it really matter who she is and why? I think it does for two reasons:
1)
Ferrante’s fame was partly built on the ‘anonymity’
and the aura of mystery that gave her instant credibility and reverence. Why? I
don’t know, but the power of the unknown
attracts people in their millions (i.e.: holy books don’t have an author and
look how many copies they have been selling!)
2)
As an anonymous writer she was unreachable and
untouchable but it left a lot to the imagination. Once the fairy-tale story
collapses with all its fantasies will she still have the same following or will
fans feel betrayed?
Personally
I’m pleased to know that she is not a popolana
from Naples, like many believed, not because a popolana couldn’t write good literature but because the romantic
idea that someone who is not enmeshed in the literary world could become famous
is so unlikely that I am glad a reality check has proved me right.
When
we talk about Elena Ferrante we must always bear in mind the writer and the
fictional character because she embodied both. And isn’t every writers dream to
become a character in your own stories and disappear in your own plots?
Ferrante
succeeded in doing that and whatever her motivation to remain anonymous might
have been it shouldn’t detract anything to her ability to be a good writer. In
becoming real she accepts the responsibilities that come with fame.
The
argument is that she should be able to choose visibility and it shouldn’t be
forced on her. Maybe, but unfortunately this is no longer the case: the rat is
out of the bag and whatever Elena Ferrante decides she will have to face the
music and dance.
Comments
Post a Comment